Search for: "U.S. v. Cooper*"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2020, 1:57 pm
The Court considered that the requirements of U.S. domestic law, and in particular certain programs enabling access by U.S. public authorities to personal data transferred from the EU to the U.S. for national security purposes, result in limitations on the protection of personal data which are not circumscribed in a way that satisfies requirements that are essentially equivalent to those required under EU law, and that this legislation does not grant data subjects… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:44 am
On May 29, two contracted Federal Protective Service officers were shot outside the Ronald V. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:07 pm
*********************** Ten years ago, Congress created a whistleblower reward program at the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:58 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Department of Game, the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
Guest, 383 U.S. 745, 757-758 (1966); Griffin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
Pix Credit HEREIt comes as no surprise that the de facto and de jure governance of the Hong Kong SAR continues to be transformed--however the Chinese Central Authorities and foreign stakeholders wish to characterize events notwithstanding. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
Under a Plea Agreement (full text) in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:59 pm
Significant Operations in the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 6:37 am
Supreme Court in Timbs v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 6:37 am
Supreme Court in Timbs v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Background In April 2019, the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
”Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598; see also Metlife, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:14 pm
Cindy first became involved with EFF in 1993, when EFF asked her to serve as the outside lead attorney in Bernstein v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:08 pm
Here, Trump asserted that separation of powers concerns required that Congress display a “demonstrated, specific need”—quoting U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 am
Strieff, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Rosenberg v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
U.S. [read post]
