Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 9:34 pm
The CAFC found there was a controversy in the case:The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia dis- missed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that there was no Article III case or controversy between the parties. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:57 am
However, I am still somehow unconvinced by divorcing licences from the issue of contracts (at least in the United States). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:39 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 10:44 am
The document doesn't state any reasons: 15-11-19 CAFC Denial of Samsung v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
United States and Perez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In the first case, Mellouli v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
FEDERAL CASES The United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the conflict between the Confrontation Clause and other rights and privileges are Crawford v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 7:36 pm
It now appears as though the much-anticipated case al-Marri v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:47 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:19 pm
“Home for me is the United States — here in my house, with my family. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
United States, it upheld the conviction of a fleeing bank robber who broke into an elderly woman’s home and instructed her to go with him to her computer room – four to nine feet away – so that police would not see him. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm
§1101(a)(3) (defining "alien" to include "any person not a citizen or national of the United States") with §1101(a)(22) (defining "national of the United States"). [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:39 am
United States, No. 1:10-cv8435 (S.D.N.Y.); see also Pedersen v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
Nike – copyright holder agreement case. [read post]
