Search for: "United States v. Matthews" Results 881 - 900 of 1,665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
Joseph Landau reviewed Peter Spiro’s book At Home in Two Countries and pondered the history of dual citizenship in the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:34 pm by kaplan4law
  The case was in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:34 pm by Matthew B. Kaplan
  The case was in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:11 pm
Supp 1395 (1996) was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
“Even though the Comstock law does not ban abortion literally,” Mitchell has explained, “it bans the shipment or receipt of any abortion-related equipment,” and no abortion takes place in the United States without some item sent in the mail. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm by Schachtman
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Chris Ford, assistant secretary of state for international security and nonproliferation at the State Department, on the future of arms control in the United States. [read post]
29 May 2008, 2:47 am
(United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Orlando Division)Civil Action No.: 6:07-CV-0227-ORL-22JGGFile No. 072 3021 Link to the case documents [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm by Santiago A. Cueto
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:05 pm by Bridget Crawford
By Charles Fried | Volume 59 | Page 60 Transcendence: Conservative Wealth and Intergenerational Succession By Richard Delgado | Volume 59 | Page 44 Applying Rules of Discovery to Information Uncovered About Jurors By Thaddeus Hoffmeister | Volume 59 | Page 28 Footloose: How to Tame the Tucker Act Shuffle After United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Sentencing Commission, 2007 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics Tables Sentencing Memorandum in United States v. [read post]