Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 881 - 900 of 5,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:43 am by Kali Borkoski
In its second order list from last week’s Conference, the Court today invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in five cases. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:08 pm
Despite the fact that class action status is a necessary tool which is provided to plaintiffs in the laws of the United States, the Supreme Court has recently displayed a pattern of ruling against class actions. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
 The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
[T]he National Development and Reform Commission. . . guides macroeconomic planning and intervenes in markets, particularly by setting prices for many products and by influencing national oil companies and other state-owned enterprises [SOEs]. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  The package provided Hurd with:  over $12 million in cash; (2) an extension of the expiration date for any outstanding options to purchase 775,000 shares of HP common stock; (3) pro rata vesting and settlement of 330,177 performance-based restricted stock units; and (4) settlement on December 11, 2010 of 15,853 nonperformance-based restricted stock units at a price equal to the lesser of (a) the closing price of HP's common stock on August 6,… [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Booky’ and noticed that Price and Windell were listed in `L.a. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:38 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In so ruling ,the Superior Court followed the reasoning of the united States Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit in State Farm v. [read post]