Search for: "United States v. State of Tex."
Results 881 - 900
of 1,787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Co., 196 S.W.3d 774, 780-81 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding); see also Austin Commercial Contractors, L.P. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
United Pentecostal Church Int'l, 899 S.W.2d 28, 30 (Tex. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Tex. 2012) (“Generics were required to produce a drug that was equivalent to the brand-name drug and were not free to unilaterally pursue a safer alternative design in order to comply with state law”); In re Pamidronate Products Liability Litigation, 842 F. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Tex. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:41 pm
App. 1993); see also United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Tex. 2012). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
Havner, 953 S.W.2d 706, 720 (Tex. 1997). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
The right to trial by jury is enshrined in the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, in relevant part: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved…. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Tex. 1989)(private right of action under exchange rules if claim is for misrepresentation or deception);andnbsp; Noland v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:21 am
The United States has made such a declaration. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:21 am
” The United States has made such a declaration. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:33 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 11:50 am
Oct. 15, 2012), the plaintiffs were former members of the class decertified as a result of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
