Search for: "Wagner v. Wagner"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm
A-S v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 564 (Admin) (17 January 2011): Bizarre “catch-22? [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 3:48 pm
v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
And Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
See Adam Wagner’s commentary on the judgment. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:13 pm
Mastoras v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
But the High Court has already ruled in a similar case (where protesters chanted “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at British soldiers) that prosecution under the public order act was legitimate, and that freedom of speech will not have been impaired by ““ruling …out” threatening, abusive or insulting speech” (Lord Reid, in Brutus v Cozens [1973] AC 854, at p. 862). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:34 am
Wagner, effective March 3, 2011, and she is charged with the duty of reporting the decisions of the present Term which have not been reported prior to March 3, 2011.Congratulations to Ms. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
See Adam Wagner’s latest post on open justice. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:26 am
Wagner v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:15 am
Warning for bloggers and tweeters as newspapers found guilty of contempt of court Adam Wagner, writing in the UK Human Rights blog, makes a few rather important points… Attorney General v Associated Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 418 (Admin) – Read judgmentFor the first time a court in England has convicted two newspapers, the Daily Mail and the Sun, of contempt of court in breach of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, for the publication of a… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
See Adam Wagner’s post on this case here. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
See Adam Wagner’s post. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] UKSC 6 (9 February 2011): Supreme Court updates Pinnock (article 8 and council possession) judgment, re order and costs. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:23 am
In that case, the judge relied on the principle explained by Mr Justice Munby in Sulaiman v Juffali [2002] 1 FLR 479, that Religion … is not the business of government or of the secular courts. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
After the recent E. coli O157:H7 outbreak linked to Bravo raw milk gouda cheese that sickened 38 (one with HUS), the New York Times is quickly becoming the go to newspaper for cheese lovers.Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese - "Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules" - after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the "60 day rule" - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks,… [read post]
