Search for: "Wallace v. Wallace"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 7:13 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Wallace C. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action, or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010; Lamanna v Pearson & Shapiro, 43 AD3d 1111; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691). [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
In Holguin-Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270 [1993]; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407 [2007]; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691 [2007]; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648 [2007]; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863 [2007]), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793 [2007]; see e.g. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
Wallace Damages The Supreme Court of Canada set new law on this issue in 1997 in Wallace v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 12:33 pm
Supreme Court handed down Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
Wallace Damages The Supreme Court of Canada set new law on this issue in 1997 in Wallace v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:14 am
Owens was later supplemented by the decision in Carter-Wallace v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:14 am
Owens was later supplemented by the decision in Carter-Wallace v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
In this case, the trial judge had to bear in mind that he had already increased the damages for wrongful dismissal in accordance with Wallace v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
A recent opinion from the Northern District of Illinois, Wallace v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
” The Appellate Division explained that courts should not "adopt an interpretation that renders a portion of the contract meaningless," citing Wallace v 600 Partners Co., 205 AD2d 202. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
In Holler v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:23 pm
No facts make short opinions.United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
” The Appellate Division explained that courts should not "adopt an interpretation that renders a portion of the contract meaningless," citing Wallace v 600 Partners Co., 205 AD2d 202. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:56 am
Doe, 530 US 290 (2000); Wallace v. [read post]
