Search for: "parts-76" Results 881 - 900 of 3,442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
I will discuss these two categories in Parts I and II and then turn to two general exceptions to the protections offered under both strands—the exception for speech integral to conduct (Part III) and the special rules for commercial advertising (Part IV). [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
I will discuss these two categories in Parts I and II and then turn to two general exceptions to the protections offered under both strands—the exception for speech integral to conduct (Part III) and the special rules for commercial advertising (Part IV). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:57 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Super72, 76 (Law Div. 1982).CARJACKING (N.J.S.A. 2C:15-2)Page 3 of 62State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 2:00 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Any person who is an heir, or a devisee or beneficiary under a will or testamentary trust, or appointee under a power of appointment exercised by a will or testamentary trust, including a person succeeding to a disclaimed interest, may disclaim in whole or in part any property or interest therein, including a future interest, by delivering and filing a disclaimer under this chapter.b. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” It could be argued that this language indicates a legislative intent that negotiating disciplinary procedures to “supplement, modify or replace” §§75 or 76 of the Civil Service Law be permissive rather than mandatory [or prohibited] subjects of collective bargaining within the meaning of the Taylor Law [Article 14 of the Civil Service Law].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_00729.htm [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
.* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Lilly ADHD dispute (Part I)* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Eli Lilly ADHD dispute (Part II)Annsley reports on the brand spanking new specialist Patents Court judge Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2015] EWHC. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”This present situation is not comparable with that in T 1107/06 [48] and dealt with in the settled jurisprudence of the boards of appeal, where – starting from a general and a preferred range – “a combination of the preferred disclosed narrower range and one of the part-ranges lying within the disclosed overall range on either side of the narrower range” is considered to be originally disclosed.A general range, which means a lower limit which is unequivocally… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
But the Applicants would not be data controllers because of Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraphs 5(2) and (3) of the implementing Data Protection Act 2018. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:30 pm
"The Second Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England" (1681) by Edward Coke, one of the most important jurists in the history of English law. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:07 am by Eugene R. Fidell
Although they avoid “the unsatisfactory alternative of settling [an] issue on the basis of ex parte affidavits, amidst a barrage of claims and counterclaims,” United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
He is also the world-record holder (an astounding 76 hot dogs and buns in ten minutes) and ranked world number 1 by Major League Eating. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out of the… [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 1:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The court of appeals turned to the fraudulent misrepresentation claim, starting with the percentage of graduates employed statistic (76% in 2010). [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 5:30 am by Cynthia Miller-Idriss
But there is no way to describe how big the growth was, in part because reporting was so uneven across urban and rural areas. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
" The expert listed 76 senior living communities using the word "Rose" as part of their names.The Board observed that, in light of recent Federal Circuit decisions, this type of evidence - "even where the specific extent and impact of the usage has not been established" - is relevant to show that a term "may have a normally understood and well-recognized descriptive or suggestive meaning, leading to the conclusion that that [term] is relatively… [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 7:31 am by Unknown
Part of the bill would allow companies to sue proxy advisory firms if they recommend voting in favor of shareholder proposals later found to be illegal, AFR noted. [read post]