Search for: "v. Oliver" Results 881 - 900 of 2,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2018, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Those causes of action were duplicative of the legal malpractice cause of action because they arose from the same operative facts and did not seek distinct and different damages (see Thompsen v Baier, 84 AD3d 1062, 1064; Symbol Tech., Inc. v Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 69 AD3d 191, 199; Maiolini v McAdams & Fallon, P.C., 61 AD3d 644, 645; Gelfand v Oliver, 29 AD3d 736; Shivers v Siegel, 11 AD3d 447). [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
 The rules have made it possible for the Eastern District of Texas, for example, to become so popular (for an entertaining 11 minutes, see John Oliver's Last Week Tonight on Patents). [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Negligence in complying with the Open Meetings Law may not be sufficient to vacated decisions made at a meeting subject to its provisionsCutler v Town of Mamakating, 2016 NY Slip Op 01543, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Town of Mamakatingabolished its position of Parks Maintenance Supervisor.The then incumbent of the position, Oliver Cutler, challenged the Town’s action. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:42 am by Jani
The interpretation of the Article in question hinges heavily, as discussed by the Attorney General, on the ECJ's earlier decision in Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace, where the Court saw that "...any human ovum must, as soon as fertilised, be regarded as a ‘human embryo’ within the meaning and for the purposes of the application of Article... since that fertilisation is such as to commence the process of development of a human being". [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
As Kat readers may recall, in May 2015, the UK Supreme Court ruled in the case of Starbucks (HK) v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
”  Justice Kennedy seemingly reached the opposite conclusion in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by David Bernstein
On Thursday, Justice Ginsburg spoke at Brandeis University on Justice Louis Brandeis and the influence of his famous brief in Muller v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
They pick up on their previous comments about whether section 9(3) CDPA on computer-generated works operates as an exception to the originality requirement, especially in light of the E&W Court of Appeal decision in THJ Systems v Sheridan. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:48 pm by Larry Downes
Google’s view was perhaps best put by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in his 1919 dissent in Abrams v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:48 am by Rosalind English
The subject is amply and philosophically discussed in publications by Professors Dawn Oliver, Carol Harlow et al. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
On 20 June 2024, the Supreme Court handed down judgement in the case of Mueen-Uddin v SSHD [2024] UKSC 21. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
”  At FiveThirtyEight, Oliver Roeder writes that “Solicitor General Donald Verrilli won Wednesday’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]