Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 8981 - 9000 of 25,654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
A Spanish court will hear whether he can be extradited to the United States. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
 As the opinion explains, [a]ccording to the Complaint, Defendant drove his automobile from Mexico to the United States Port of Entry in Calexico, California. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:10 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
” Verrilli represented the interests of the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Monday is Columbus Day, a government holiday, so the orders list from today's conference will be issued Tuesday. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:43 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
For many families in Florida and throughout the United States, trampolines represent a great source of fun. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:43 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
For many families in Florida and throughout the United States, trampolines represent a great source of fun. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:59 am by James R. Marsh
Last week, the Solicitor General filed this brief with the United States Supreme Court which effectively denies child victims the ability to obtain criminal restitution from the thousands of child molesters and pedophiles who collect and share child pornography. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Arthur Bright
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557 (U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 As the United States Supreme Court has explained: we must recognize that settlements frequently result in the plaintiff’s getting more than he would have been entitled to at trial. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Bradley Graveline and Jennifer Driscoll-Chippendale  On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]