Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 13,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:20 pm
In Dixon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:46 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California made quick work of the Complaint, ultimately dismissing it for failure to state a claim. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
” National Bank v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
The summary at the opinion’s outset says it simply: “In this appeal, we address whether the renewal of forty-one water supply contracts by the United States Bureau of Reclamation violates § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
Ct. 1662 (2010), the United States Supreme Court considered a fee award in a class action civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
As explained in Part I, California v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:48 pm
County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
The brief comes as a response to a recent decision by the Second Circuit to limit the protections under Section 109 of the Copyright Act to works created within the United States in John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
(I'll leave for another day her implicit claim that the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case and overrule X.)But Justice Liu is also correct. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:33 pm
In Ralphs Grocery v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:57 am
It may soon be up to the California Supreme Court to determine the applicable scope of AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:14 am
” - Bruce Cain, Heller Professor of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley “Just in time for the election, Rick Hasen brings this essential reminder of all the lessons never learned after Bush v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
Granfield v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
Mak, No. 08-50148, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (June 21, 2012). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
United States: According to UPI, a libel insurance issue has derailed the pending release of a documentary entitled “Unlawful Killing” about a supposed coverup of the death of Princess Diana. [read post]
