Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 55,740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 3:39 am
As explained in Hesham Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] 1 WLR 4799, Parliamentary and public concern about failures to deport large numbers of foreign citizens who had committed serious offences in the UK led to the adoption of the UK Borders Act 2007, which provided that for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s power to deport under the 1971 Act, the deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
In cases like Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Nestlé v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 12:24 pm
Goonan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 11:07 am
In Central Radio Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:35 am
A person in Wyoming thus has 65 times more voting power in the Senate than a person living in California. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
Draper v City of Arlington TX, 2021 WL 2966139 (TX App. 7/15/2021) [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
" Lunney v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 3:22 am
(§ 32 V-W.) [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm
In Gundy v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In its 1989 decision in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 2:20 pm
Frey (Treaty Rights) Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:12 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:25 am
Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:17 am
The Parens Patriae Model In 1892, in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
