Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 9001 - 9020 of 13,836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm by Mali Friedman
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all eight claims in Low v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm by Mali Friedman
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all eight claims in Low v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
As I have noted before, New Mexico is the only United States jurisdiction that makes polygraph evidence presumptively admissible barring a prior stipulation by the parties. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
For these reasons, the Court concluded that the Luedtkes abandoned any residence they had in the United States and, at the time Heidi brought the children to the United States, their habitual residence was Switzerland. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Lucy H. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm by Lawrence Solum
In the United States, by contrast, the rhetoric of diversity is everywhere. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
He is attended by his wife, Jane, and by Bishop Barry Beisner, his successor as the diocesan in Northern California. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:35 am by Jon Miller
Wiley won the case with the Second Circuit ruling that the first sale doctrine only applies to goods manufactured in the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
Twenty-five of the forty-two states that have considered IIEI have adopted it, and the United States Supreme Court called IIEI a “widely recognized” tort. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm by Schachtman
United States, and in In re Agent Orange: “Judge Weinstein, on the other hand, was far less concerned with the strictness of the epidemiology. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by Robert M. Jaworski
The Lower Courts’ Decisions The Complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:18 am by Michael O'Hear
I’ll always remember the day the Supreme Court declared the Gun-Free School Zones Act unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]