Search for: "English v. English" Results 9021 - 9040 of 11,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 5:21 am by charonqc
In this view I was supported by the comments of Judge Newman in the case of DPP-v-Avery (2001) who stated that ‘the wearing of a mask can be a potent means of demonstrating in a lawful manner. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:01 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Williams, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2552 (02 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Chadwick v Hollingsworth [2010] EWCA Civ 1210 (02 November 2010) Crosstown Music Company 1 LLC v Rive Droite Music Ltd & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1222 (02 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McLaughlin & Ors v London Borough of Lambeth & Anor [2010] EWHC 2726 (QB) (02 November 2010) Chadwick v… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
In Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurance Bureau [2010] EWCA Civ 1208, the Court of Appeal held that where a person is injured by an uninsured driver and is entitled to recover from the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB), that person is entitled to recover damages assessed according to English law, rather than the law where the accident occurred.The appellant, Mr Jacobs (a resident of the UK) was seriously injured when struck by a car while holidaying in Spain. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:45 am by John Morris
Supreme Court in the “violent video game” case, Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am by Lyle Denniston
If there was one strategic error by counsel in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Please post your comments below.To have a look at Max' entertaining presentation on AdWords "It's the ad-text, stupid", please click here (German) and here (English).Regarding "vagueness", see here [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:08 am by gmlevine
” The conjunctive requirement, however, is coming under increasing attack, as is clear in Jappy GmbH v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:18 am by INFORRM
  Nevertheless, this case does illustrate an important gap in the present English law of libel. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
 While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 am by Lisa McElroy
Many Plain English readers will be interested in the case of Skinner v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
We are not aware of any other libel or privacy cases dealt with in the English Courts last week. [read post]