Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 16,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It is the official public record of the basis of judicial acts and of state interference with family life. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm
New York State Supreme Court, 60 Centre Street We can sit by the fire. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am
Just as conservatives hoped that Fisher would be used to overrule Grutter, they now hope that Schuette will be used to overrule the political structure strand of equal protection jurisprudence adopted in Hunter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
Notwithstanding the fact that the minimum statutory damages are pretty darn high.I hope I'm wrong. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm
” I hope that’s clear. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:48 pm
We hope the Ninth Circuit agrees. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:05 pm
But in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 10:36 pm
Sheetz Flushing Subway’s Footlong TM Hope? [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
Mere conclusions, expressions of hope or unsubstantiated allegations or assertions are insufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:52 pm
Patent No. 8,014,760 (missed telephone call management), a patent that the United States Patent and Trademark Office started to reexamine a couple of weeks ago. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:36 am
I hope to finish that next week. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:40 pm
Speaking of India’s contentious compulsory licensing order in Natco v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm
While Guenther did reject that argument, it did apply the fundamental “independence principle” (see our discussion here) to black box warnings involving innovator drugs, which is the most we reasonably could hope for.The next preemption argument in Guenther had to do with state-law claims that the dosage of A/Z should be changed. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
Mere conclusions, expressions of hope or unsubstantiated allegations or assertions are insufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
