Search for: "High v State" Results 9021 - 9040 of 35,522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2009, 10:34 am
  Courts like the Ninth Circuit rely on the fact that the Supreme Court has never actually spelled out that money is property (an issue also at the heart of an otherwise unrelated case seeking high court review, Empress Casino v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Director for Public Prosecutions appealed successfully by way of case stated to the High Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Randy Barnhart
“In determining the existence of diversity jurisdiction, a corporation is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
  At the opening of this Term, it granted review of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am by Tian Lu
 Second instance [Case reference: Civil Judgment No. 319 [2021], Final, Civil, Shaanxi of the High People's Court of Shaanxi Province. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The opinion includes a lengthy analysis of the state action doctrine as applied to the prison's food service contractor.In Seamons v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 5:27 am by Alyson Drake
Justice Ginsburg used her position to continue the fight for women’s rights, upholding the Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 7:15 pm by Anna Christensen
On Thursday, the Supreme Court held in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 2:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Al Ahmed v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2020) EWCA Civ 51 We saw the High Court in this case take an incredibly strict approach to homelessness section 204 appeal timescales (our report), deciding that seeking legal aid representation could not be a good reason for filing an appeal out of time because, well, the substance of any appeal should be obvious to an unrepresented homeless applicant. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 2:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Al Ahmed v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2020) EWCA Civ 51 We saw the High Court in this case take an incredibly strict approach to homelessness section 204 appeal timescales (our report), deciding that seeking legal aid representation could not be a good reason for filing an appeal out of time because, well, the substance of any appeal should be obvious to an unrepresented homeless applicant. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:38 am
Accordingly, it stated that the claim covered use of a magnesium salt of esomeprazole with an optical purity of ? [read post]