Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 29,027
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
The Court of Appeals also noted that the United States Supreme Court stated a “basic teaching of representative government … that elected officials represent all of those who elect them, and not merely those who are their neighbors," citing Dusch (387 US 112, Dallas County, Alabama v Reese (421 US 477) and Fortson v Dorsey, 379 US 433. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 11:35 am
In a previous post I had sounded the alarm about Yokoyama v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:42 am
Secretary Solis concluded her comments by stating, “We’re living in the year 2011—not 1911. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 2:19 pm
Introduction This year marks the seventy-fifth anniversary of West Coast Hotel Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:13 am
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:30 pm
Recent cases involving universities' claims of sovereign immunity resulted in the successful dismissal of IPRs - see Neochord v University of Maryland (Case IPR2016-00208) and Covidien v University of Florida Research Foundation (IPR2016-01274-6)Living in rural New York State and Canada, the Mowhawk Tribe is a community of approximately 13,000 and is part of the Iroquois Nation (read about the tribe's culture and history here). [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
” A new world was dawning in the United States as well, King said, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
By Eric Goldman Doe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Bremeton School District, and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
The Secretary of State’s submissions were clear as to the result. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
In dissent, Chief Judge Fearing argued the department had opened the email system to religious messages by forwarding newsletters from its health insurer about solving personal problems and living a healthy lifestyle, because the government may not “prefer secular chatter over religious oration” (Sprague v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
Those premises, built to be lived in by one family, were a gift to the defendant by her father in 1955. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:10 am
The parties lived in the United States and had their child in 2013. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
In addition, the claimants stated that their constitutional rights had been violated due to the conditions they were forced to live in. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 9:26 am
I've gone back and reviewed the beginning of the tape and, sure enough, Judge Pooler states that Judge Sach (sp?) [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:59 am
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 25. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:24 am
joint v. sole? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
