Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 9021 - 9040 of 120,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2018, 9:51 am by Michael Risch
His first normative point is that we may prefer countermajoritarian oversight of Congress. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 6:21 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 806 provides that When a hearsay statement, or a statement defined in Rule 801(d)(2)(C), (D), or (E), has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked, and if attacked may be supported,... [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:25 pm
The post-Rivera decision of theUnited States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California, 549 US 270 [2007] suggests that Rivera might not be the last word on the constitutionality of the New York persistent sentencing law. [read post]