Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 9021 - 9040 of 15,310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am by Orin Kerr
“[B]ecause the subpoena at issue unnecessarily demands documents that are irrelevant to the grand jury inquiry,” Mukasey concluded, “it is unreasonably broad under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c). [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Termination of a police officer while on leave pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c Olsen v Dormer, 13 Misc 3d 1236(A) Steven B. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 9:33 pm
EU/USA/China-Africa relations) − the participation of African States in international economic organizations and in their systems of dispute resolution − problems related to foreign investments c) Human rights and criminal justice: the African viewpoint − international criminal justice v. traditional models of reconciliation − achievements and failures of international criminal justice − the specificity of the regional system of human rights… [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
While that judgment made no reference to Grand Theft, it cited as the Offense Statute Number/s only section 812.014(2)(b)(1). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Detective A conducted the lineup identification procedure and Detective B was involved in the investigation. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Case law’s most extensive treatment: Letterese v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:24 am by JP Sarmiento
According to the INA Section 203(b) states, in pertinent part, that: (1)   Priority workers – visas shall first be made available… to qualified immigrants who are aliens described in any of the following sub-paragraphs (A) through (C): (A) Aliens with extraordinary – an alien is described in this sub-paragraph if- (i)  The alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletes which has been demonstrated by… [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
Accordingly, defendants conclude, [Lazette] fails to state a claim under § 2701. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant cites the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Jose Padilla v Kentucky, 130 S. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Devlin Hartline
If P violates his duty and enters O’s land, O then has a legally enforceable claim against P, and O can summon the power of the state to prevent P from entering his land. [read post]