Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 10,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
(2) Electronic notice, if the notice provided is consistent with the provisions regarding electronic records and signatures set forth in Section 7001 of Title 15 of the United States Code. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 10:37 pm
The Yankees got off to a rocky start by alleging that "Applicant did not use the BASEBALLS EVIL EMPIRE mark for the goods covered in the Application in United States commerce prior to its constructive first use date of July 7, 2008. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
(Ars Technica) United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Virgin Media boxes safe (for now): Gemstar v Virgin Media (IPKat) ACS:Law plans to file thousands of P2P demand letters (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) Digital Economy Bill introduced (Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) (Ars Technica) (Michael Geist) (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Michael Geist) Digital Economy – if you hate the bill, you’ll love the petition (The 1709 Copyright Blog) Selling mod chips is a… [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:36 am
United States U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
KG (IPKat) (Class 46) CFI: Frag Comercio Internacional, SL v OHIM, Tinkerbell Modas LTDA – Have you ever seen two less likely allegedly similar marks? [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:30 am
" # # # Matter of Goldstein v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- With oral argument in the rehearing en banc of Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:30 am
Shelnutt's trial began, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
First, Smiley alleges that these Counts present no case or controversy as required by the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C § 2201, and Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
The Nuremberg International Military Tribunal addressed the issue of pre-emptive strikes in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:26 am
PACER is a service of the United States Judiciary. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm
" [of the result]I first scoured the majority opinion, written by Ginsburg, looking for how the court would distinguish the principle in this case from the principle in [United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(IP Osgoode) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit remands cybersquatting case to Western District: Lahoti v Vericheck (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
According to United States Patent and Trademark Office trademark examination protocol: “A sound mark identifies and distinguishes a product or service through audio rather than visual means. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
According to United States Patent and Trademark Office trademark examination protocol: "A sound mark identifies and distinguishes a product or service through audio rather than visual means. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:49 pm
Copyright © 2009 Mark Bennett. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:34 pm
The seizure violated the 4thAmendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Umbro's Delaware-based subsidiary handled its business in the United States. [read post]
