Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 9041 - 9060 of 14,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Irvine clearly disagreed flatly will all of this “prevailing orthodoxy”, pointing out the enervating effect of this reasoning in Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal) [2011] UKSC 43, in which Lord Hope seemed afraid (paragraphs 67-72) to go further than Strasbourg has gone as he put it more than once. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:29 am by Graeme Hall
The Court’s Priority Policy states that the application will be ranked. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Commission did not do so but I hope a coalition will emerge to act. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
  In the space of three consecutive paragraphs Lord Hope states that persecution involves a violation of a core entitlement under international law, he then identifies non-discrimination as a fundamental purpose of the Refugee Convention but subsequently declares that discrimination against members of a particular social group is not sufficient to establish refugee status. [read post]