Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 14,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Lord Irvine clearly disagreed flatly will all of this “prevailing orthodoxy”, pointing out the enervating effect of this reasoning in Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal) [2011] UKSC 43, in which Lord Hope seemed afraid (paragraphs 67-72) to go further than Strasbourg has gone as he put it more than once. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:29 am
The Court’s Priority Policy states that the application will be ranked. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:00 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
., United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Wadhwa v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:16 am
United States, available here. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
I hope to hear from you by the end of the day. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 6:49 am
In Ruhlen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 9:11 am
In Sykes v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
The Commission did not do so but I hope a coalition will emerge to act. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
In Polar Tankers v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
In one of the most interesting and potentially important cases on this Term’s Supreme Court docket, FCC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:22 am
Gutierrez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
(She does seem to think that Brown v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 4:12 am
See e.g., Best Buy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
In the space of three consecutive paragraphs Lord Hope states that persecution involves a violation of a core entitlement under international law, he then identifies non-discrimination as a fundamental purpose of the Refugee Convention but subsequently declares that discrimination against members of a particular social group is not sufficient to establish refugee status. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]