Search for: "In Re L."
Results 9041 - 9060
of 22,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 7:04 am
§ 41.37(c)(l)(iv), but the rule does not require an appellant to show examiner error in uncontested grounds of rejection. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 6:26 am
.): 56 DCT Order to Show Cause re Rule 19 57 Plaintiff’s Brief 58 DNR Brief 61 KBIC Letter 62 Fond du Lac Band Letter 63 Red Cliff Band 64 LCO Brief 66 Plaintiff’s Response to Tribes 67 DCT Order Dismissing Complaint An excerpt: Plaintiff, Brenda Turunen, is a member of the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community (KBIC), a federally recognized Indian tribe in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula that is the successor-in-interest to the L’Anse and Ontonagon bands of the Lake… [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
Michael L. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
In other words, you’re not just stupid once, but twice. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
Matthew Swyers (The Trademark Company) Sues USPTO For HarassmentTTAB Posts January 2016 Hearing Schedule"Text John L. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
The second is Eric Lindenfeld & Jasper L. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 12:59 am
Méndez llevaba a cabo su esquema de la venta de los dinares emulando el esquema de Ty Rhame promoviendo la re-valuación. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 12:59 am
Méndez llevaba a cabo su esquema de la venta de los dinares emulando el esquema de Ty Rhame promoviendo la re-valuación. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:40 pm
L is for Limits on Deductions. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:00 pm
A l'argument selon lequel la décision de rejet n'est pas suffisamment motivée ("à peine 2 pages") et ne présente aucun motif de rejet de la revendication indépendante 5, la Chambre rétorque que le nombre de pages d'une décision n'est pas en soi un critère pour juger de sa conformité à la règle 111(2) CBE et que pour [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 2:43 pm
L is for Limits on Deductions. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:35 am
You’re dealing with the crisis du jour. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
Posted by Steven L. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
The American Journal of Legal History is now relaunched with the posting of the special issue: The Future of Legal History 56:1 (March 2016).Introducing the Future of Legal History: On Re-launching the American Journal of Legal HistoryAlfred L. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:52 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:04 am
By Gerald L. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:28 am
L is for Limits on Deductions. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:23 am
The $233.4 million that went out to survivors and first responders this month is a result of Congress’ decision late last year to re-authorize the James L. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 6:46 am
Dist. 2006); In re Interest of Phoenix L., 708 N.W.2d 786, 797-89 (Neb. 2006), rev’d on other grounds; Matter of M.K., 964 P.2d 241, 244 (Okla. [read post]
