Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 45,531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am
Circuit ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
This morning one woke up, hours aftre President Trump declared a national emergency, to news that the House of Representatives (with the encouragement of both President Trump and Speaker Pelosi) passed HR 6201, the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
However, the CJEU disagreed with the GC's conclusion that the absence of such a statement would preclude any association between those shops and the goods of the mark applied for.First, the CJEU emphasised that the line of authority derived from Praktiker concerned only applications for registration as TMs and did not concern protection of trade marks registered at the time of the Praktiker judgment (EUIPO v Cactus, C-501/15 P). [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am
In 1824, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Gibbons v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:32 am
"V. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
” Basic Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Apple v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 2:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 7:21 am
The article concludes by asserting that the Court’s line of argumentation brings another dimension to the Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit debate. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:49 am
Federal Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:57 am
Shadi.com v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm
A holding along these lines would send the issue back to the House committees. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 11:22 am
” Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
In 2012, a magistrate judge issued an opinion along the same lines, in Bixby v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Environmental Protection Agency release reporting requirements under 40 CFR § 302.6 (National Response Center, “NRC” notice), any state release reporting requirements under the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality LAC 33:I.Chapter 39 release reporting requirements; and the Louisiana State Police release reporting requirements under LAC 33:V.Chapter 101. [1] Public Law 101– 549, 104 Stat. 2399 (November 15, 1990). [2] 42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(6)(C)(i) and (ii).… [read post]
