Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 19,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2015, 5:31 am
As we reported yesterday, the Commission’s late-October “Second Order on Reconsideration” with respect to its channel sharing rules was published in the Federal Register on November 2, even though its predecessor, last June’s “First Order on Reconsideration” in the same matter, still hadn’t graced the Register’s pages. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 4:45 am
Don’t assert control over them. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:47 pm
Except when they don't. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:16 pm
As Foster’s lawyer, Stephen B. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:55 am
District Judge James B. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:20 am
Our adversarial legal system cuts off the "three year old" game, both because some answers are not legally relevant (it doesn't matter, for example, "why" exculpatory evidence didn't reach a defendant, under Brady doctrine), and because some answers are not strategically helpful (it's not helpful, for example, to a Brady claim if defense counsel got a little lazy in looking under the hood of the prosecution's case). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
Supreme Court has held that antidiscrimination laws “do not, as a general matter, violate the First . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:10 am
” 2015 WL 6405811, at *2 (quoting In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 2015 WL 4387780, at *5 (F.C.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:10 am
” 2015 WL 6405811, at *2 (quoting In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 2015 WL 4387780, at *5 (F.C.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
”In contrast section 8 of the Representation Agreement Act provides:Test of incapability for standard provisions8 (1) An adult may make a representation agreement consisting of one or more of the standard provisions authorized by section 7 even though the adult is incapable of(a) making a contract,(b) managing his or her health care, personal care or legal matters, or(c) the routine management of his or her financial affairs.(2) In deciding whether an adult is… [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm
§ 689.25(b). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
Who am I to object even if I can't fathom why it would? [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
Seventh Circuit: science was a matter of public debate; but yes, it proposes a commercial transaction at its core, even if it touches on a matter of public debate. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
Abortion regulations provide precedent for saying that extremely controversial subject matter can’t be subject to labeling, no matter how true it is. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 am
§ 2252(b)(2) because that provision only covers prior state-law convictions “involving a minor or ward. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Contact the Law Office of Robert B. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:29 am
In certain cases, however, the DMA doesn’t accurately reflect the true “local” market of a particular station. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
That discretion did not create a license to impose no qualifications on purchasers at all, the state commissioners contended.In their opening brief, Galvin and Lindeen had cited Justice Scalia’s observation that “[i]t does not matter whether the word ‘yellow’ is ambiguous when the agency has interpreted it to mean ‘purple. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:19 am
Aliphcom, Inc. d/b/a Jawbone won an early legal battle in a lawsuit filed against five of its former employees and its rival Fitbit, Inc. [read post]
