Search for: "Petition of United States" Results 9041 - 9060 of 23,983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 4:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner stated that he intended to call two witnesses to testify in support of his Petition. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner’s counsel demonstrated the necessity of the long distance telephone calls, having included line items indicating the necessity of calling the United States State Department, an attorney in Mexico, the Mexican consulate, and Petitioner concerning the return of DFB to Mexico. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Diaz’s June 2015 return to the United States with the children was not wrongful, but agreed-to. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
United States 16-1063 Issues: (1) Whether the government violated the petitioners’ Fifth Amendment rights by using their post-arrest, pre-Miranda v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm by Bob Farb
The United States Supreme Court granted the State’s petition to review the federal appellate court’s ruling, and it reversed that ruling. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
H.R.2284: To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide for congressional and State approval of national monuments and restrictions on the use of national monuments. [read post]
6 May 2017, 10:00 pm by Brenda Hall-Busch
Food allergies are a serious problem in the United States, and indeed, around the world. [read post]
6 May 2017, 5:21 pm by Andrea K. Schneider
I had originally expected the highest court in Israel to resemble the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am by Patricia Salkin
In appeal No. 1, petitioners appealed and QCL cross-appealed from a judgment dening respondents’ motions to dismiss Riverkeeper’s petition and the Wooster petitioners’ amended petition for lack of standing, and granted respondents’ motions to dismiss the petition and amended petition except insofar as the Wooster petitioners claimed that respondents violated the performance bond provisions of General City Law §§ 27–a (7) and… [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Affinity appealed to thiscourt and the Director of the United States Patent andTrademark Office (Director) intervened. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:19 am by Helen Klein Murillo
It is not clear whether the United States has agreed to that prohibition or whether Russia will enforce the no-fly zone. [read post]
4 May 2017, 3:07 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
            On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 3:07 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
            On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 12:52 pm by Nathan Dorn
He read law with Aaron Burr (the sitting vice president of the United States) between 1800 and 1802 and practiced law in the law office of J.L. and H.L. [read post]