Search for: "State v. Loss" Results 9041 - 9060 of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by Andrew Hamm
For his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen suggests that Paul Clement wrote the brief for North Carolina “as if there were still a five Justice conservative majority on the Court,” despite foreseeing a defeat by this approach, so that Clement and the state “could paint the loss as caused by the ‘liberal Justices. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
A seismic shift in the state's civil litigation landscape was felt on June 28 when state Gov. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Specific Media Judge Recognizes Loss of Value to PII as Basis of Standing for Data Breach Plaintiff — Claridge v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:51 am
For tax cases, this meant that the former rather rote sentencing, which, under the guidelines, had been based primarily on the amount of tax loss or tax evaded, was opened up to the other considerations outlined in Booker.Schumacher describes the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accruing vacation and sick leave credits during leave for ordered military leaveAndrews v State of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 02895, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAn employee of the State as the employer absent from his or her position while on “ordered military duty,” is placed on military leave* from his or her position in accordance with provisions in the State Military Law and the Rules of the State Civil Service Commission. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan One of the safest bets in recent years was that Republicans would conveniently drop the pretense that they believe in states' rights as soon as their manufactured Supreme Court super-majority handed them their long-sought repeal of Roe v. [read post]