Search for: "United States v. California" Results 9041 - 9060 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by Lovechilde
San Quentin State Prison 40 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Eric
If SOPA had passed, undoubtedly we would have seen an increase in enforcement actions between two foreign litigants without real ties to the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:21 pm by Georgialee Lang
It seems that he was wrong on that account too, at least according to the majority of the United State Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
Maldonado's trial is set for March 2013; however defense attorneys indicate that they will appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:31 am
In a case pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Goodman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:58 am by Russ Bensing
In 1999, 98 people were executed in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm by Ken
I'm looking for a lawyer admitted in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and preferably working in the Bay Area, to act as pro bono local counsel for someone involved in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm by Ken
I'm looking for a lawyer admitted in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and preferably working in the Bay Area, to act as pro bono local counsel for someone involved in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
When the Supreme Court hears Kirtsaeng's case, it will seek to resolve the discrepancy in the Copyright Law and the issue of whether the Copyright Law applies to a copy that was made and legally acquired abroad and then imported into the United States, SCOUTUSblog.com reports. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
Judge Tallman begins this opinion with the line:  "The United States Constitution and federal law require that crimes be prosecuted where the offense was committed. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]