Search for: "B. M." Results 9061 - 9080 of 28,012
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2017, 7:32 am by José Guillermo
En mi opinión, el Ministro de Cultura se condujo con gran inteligencia al contestar la petición del sacerdote mistiano y más inteligente aun no decir una sola palabra sobre el alegato posterior de la autoridad eclesial, al menos no he leído nada al respecto. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Dutcher greeted Good and told him `I'm here to kill the President, the usurper, tomorrow at his speech. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by Nelson Tebbe
At root, that law prohibits the government from taking “discriminatory action” against religious actors that hold any of three enumerated religious or moral beliefs: a) that “[m]arriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman;” b) that “[s]exual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage;” or c) that “male (man) or female (woman) refer to an individual's immutable biological sex as objectively… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The court observed further that, unlike Section 10(b), Rule 105 involves two transactional events: selling short a security and subsequently purchasing the same security in an offering. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:09 pm by Jarod Bona
I have also read many briefs, both practicing law and clerking for Judge James B. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
” In reality, as the dissent itself highlights (though it is most committed to the no-impeachment rule), “[m]any jurisdictions now have rules that prohibit or restrict post-verdict contact with jurors. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
That choice is between upholding ordestroying venue protections that Congress provided in28 U.S.C. 1400(b), and that this Court interpreting thatstatute declared to exist in its Fourco Glass decision.And the correct choice, we submit, is to adhere to thisCourt's existing, long-established interpretation ofSection 1400(b) and to reject the new call for a newrevisionist interpretation that would render Section1400(b) nugatory in this case and in all but the mostunusual… [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:30 am by Daniel Shaviro
The answer is yes, given that the present value of one's tax liability from the account is zero, if we assume both (a) that the account just earns normal returns that the taxpayer can't scale up (a la Mark Zuckerberg hypothetically deciding to create two comparably profitable Facebooks rather than just one), and (b) that the taxpayer's marginal rate is the same at the contribution and withdrawal stages. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
On this date in 1969, the first national Chicano youth conference was held in Denver, Colorado by Crusade for Justice, the civil rights organization founded by former boxer Corky Gonzáles. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
On this date in 1969, the first national Chicano youth conference was held in Denver, Colorado by Crusade for Justice, the civil rights organization founded by former boxer Corky Gonzáles. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Si le demandeur n'avait pas été suspendu à tort, il aurait obtenu le bénéfice de ses rémun [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:40 pm
 But if I'm in a new boat with a virtually new motor, I expect it will work. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Esbozó que el Artículo 1(b) de la Ley Núm. 115-1991, conocida como la “Ley de Acción por Represalia del Patrono”, definió patrono como “cualquier persona que tenga uno o más empleados” e “[i]ncluye a los agentes del patrono”. [read post]