Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 9061 - 9080 of 45,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
In more than four years of Android litigation, Apple has not been able to show even one line of copied program code. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Danielle Citron
  Here is the piece: Last week’s unanimous decision of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:40 am by Rick Garnett
  The Supreme Court this morning granted cert in Hosanna Tabor Church v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
The Court of Appeals decision yesterday (Thursday) in the case of Board of Commissioners of LaPorte County, Board of Commissioners of Porter County, Town of Beverly Shores, et al v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Statutory presumption that an individual suffered a disease of the heart as a result of the performance of duty rebutted by medical evidence to the contraryMatter of Lawless v DiNapoli, 2008 NY Slip Op 09335, decided on November 26, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentRobert E. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm by Nancy Rapoport
Just think of how surprised, upset and defensive you feel if someone accosts you at Starbucks and announces that you just cut in line. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Applicant rejected after being found overqualified for appointment to the positionCity of New London v Harrigan, CA2*May an individual be so overqualified for the position so as to justify his or her being rejected for an appointment to the title? [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:44 pm by John Gregory
Where would you draw the line? [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In New Breed of Patent Claim Bedevils Product Makers , DIONNE SEARCEY covered aspects of the false patent marking issue found in the Federal Circuit case Stauffer v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:52 am
The key case in this area is New Jersey v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  In Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch J20, the Court restrained publication of private etchings drawn by Queen Victoria and her husband. [read post]