Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 22,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2017, 3:27 am
The ruling in Ali’s favor kept him out of the war, but it did nothing at all to settle the question of whether the undeclared war in Vietnam was unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
In the early years after the adoption of the Charter, Quebec routinely invoked the Notwithstanding Clause, but since then it has become virtually unusable as a practical matter. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
The De Vita court followed authorities holding “the adoption and amendment of a general plan is a local legislative matter and not of statewide concern” and thus a proper subject of the constitutional initiative power. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
The De Vita court followed authorities holding “the adoption and amendment of a general plan is a local legislative matter and not of statewide concern” and thus a proper subject of the constitutional initiative power. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:45 am
Nor does it matter that aliens do not have a constitutional right to enter the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am
The majority found that a challenge under the one-subject rule is a challenge to the entire bill. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm
The Rules of the Court require that every case be prosecuted in the name of a real party. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:50 am
Why should this matter? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
As was the case after the adoption of SB 471 in 2001, there may be litigation over the retroactive application of the amendment to notices served prior to its effective date (the 2001 amendments were deemed retroactively applicable procedural rules, and there is every reason to believe that this amendment will be treated similarly). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
As was the case after the adoption of SB 471 in 2001, there may be litigation over the retroactive application of the amendment to notices served prior to its effective date (the 2001 amendments were deemed retroactively applicable procedural rules, and there is every reason to believe that this amendment will be treated similarly). [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 2:18 pm
Once a case is argued, judges have 4 months to issue a ruling. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 2:18 pm
Once a case is argued, judges have 4 months to issue a ruling. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
These new rules are likely to complicate matters for the several firms that have promised to add drone delivery services to their offerings. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
Is it a qualified privilege, subject to being lost through abuse or bad faith, or is it an absolute immunity that insulates all statements to police against defamation claims no matter the intentions of the speaker? [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:57 pm
”[11] Corruption, and especially bribery, has become a matter of international concern. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:08 am
Trade Negotiations Are Becoming Less Open, Not More Far from adopting the enhanced measures of transparency and openness that EFF demanded and that U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm
Rather, noting that “context matters” when determining whether a work rule violates the NLRA, the court found the policies read in the context of the workplace established common sense civility guidelines that a reasonable employee would not read as chilling or discouraging organization activities protected under Section 7. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:25 am
’s patentee-friendly rules; is there a systemic reason? [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:09 am
In addition, they violated Rule 206(4)-7 by failing to adopt and implement appropriate policies and procedures and Section 207 of the Act by making untrue statements in SEC filings, according to the Commission. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
In short, as a legal matter, religion has nothing to do with this case. [read post]
