Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am
United States and explains that, “[a]s a statutory interpretation case,” it “is especially notable in two ways: for using ordinary principles of statutory interpretation in a treaty implementation case and for the lack of interpretive deference afforded the Executive Branch. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:16 am
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
(Citing County of Amador v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 1:49 pm
However, the district court for the Northern District of California dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims for lack of protection under the ATS predominantly because human rights abuses in China do not adequately “touch and concern” the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
Regents of University of California (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1025 and Chawanakee Unified School District v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:00 am
And in courtrooms across the United States, EFF battled over issues of freedom and privacy. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Unilever US, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 9. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:30 pm
In March, in Connick v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:34 pm
It was made clear that Senate Republicans would not support the passage of the bill unless it included provisions to strengthen border security and deter illegal immigration into the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 3:02 pm
Chantiles v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
Hansen In Sierra Forest Legacy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
" Plaintiffs are the franchise representatives throughout the State of California. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
Section 1341 before the United States District Court for the Central District of California in the criminal action entitled U. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:18 am
The Supreme Court of the United States held in Feres v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
The Court saw the license denial as an effort by New York to horde a resource and thereby keep prices for its consumers low.Edwards v California (1941) considered a challenge to a California law aimed at reducing the influx of dustbowl indigents to the state. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 11:07 am
” In the recent case of State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
United States invalidated Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell (DADT). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
