Search for: "Fail v. State"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 66,266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm
[1] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Thaler). [2] Both the European Patents Office and the UK High Court have recently rejected patent applications naming DABUS as the inventor. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am
Bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind or intention (Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C‑104/18 P)). [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:08 am
Failing that, there is no power to review. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am
….(5)If the justices are of opinion that an application under this section is frivolous, they may refuse to state a case, and, if the applicant so requires, shall give him a certificate stating that the application has been refused; but the justices shall not refuse to state a case if the application is made by or under the direction of the Attorney General. (6)Where justices refuse to state a case, the High Court may, on the application of the person who… [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
July 21, 2021) is another case in which a party (in this case the plaintiff) failed because the expert failed to provide specifics. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 5:39 pm
Citing Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 10:29 am
Magsig v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 6:49 am
In the case of Reilly v Iconic Newspaper [2021] IEHC 490, a consultant engineer with the same name as a man who was banned from driving by an Irish court faces having to pay a costs bill running into six figures after failing in a bid to sue a newspaper over its report of the case. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:40 am
This was especially true back in 2008, before patent examiners should have applied guidance from the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 10:45 am
See, e.g., Mendes v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 10:25 am
Conversely, in Transunion v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 6:44 am
Bader v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 6:44 am
Bader v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:15 am
The hope is that buying a couple more months will give states time to distribute COVID relief monies to tenants to prevent mass evictions. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 7:12 pm
Henry v City of Somerton, 2021 WL 2514686 (D AZ 6/17/2021) [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 4:29 pm
IndiaX v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
Commercial Builders, Inc., 936 F.2d 1462, 1469–70 (4th Cir. 1991); see also, e.g., State Nat’l Ins. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
