Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 61,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 6:26 pm
Florida v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 7:43 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:43 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dale Mundy v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brief for United States 47–48. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
Emma v MEC for Health Gauteng Province (2022/12482) [2024] ZAGPJHC 276 (15 March 2024) (saflii.org) This blog was authored by Brigitte Geyer, candidate attorney, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 5:29 am
Hofmann v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:15 am
Ct. 2527) the Supreme Court found the introduction of state forensic-lab reports is testimonial evidence requiring the appearance at trial of lab technicians.Here is a list of some subsequent decisions:Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:22 pm
The Missouri Supreme Court’s grant of relief in State ex rel. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 4:43 am
From Judge Marco Hernandez's decision posted yesterday in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:01 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:04 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court took an unexpected turn in its second civil decision of Friday morning, using State Bank of Cherry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:36 pm
The ruling in Chrysafis v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:23 pm
Smith concurred, focusing on the lack of AEDPA deference given to the state courts by the district court under AEDPA.U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 12:29 pm
Government work is tough:"The Department of Social Services is the state agency responsible for determining, through its Disability Determination Service Division, the medical eligibility of disabled Californians who are seeking federal Social Security benefits or state Medi-Cal benefits. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:08 am
Individual rather than the court responsible for identifying the "cause of action"Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential]Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination complaint "for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28… [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
However, he stated there was a “strong public interest in this statutory regime”. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
On June 30, 2024, the district court granted a motion for preliminary injunction, enjoining the GA AG from enforcing Act 564. [read post]
