Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 19,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2015, 12:46 pm
The big problem for the defendants here is the Federal Circuit’s clear holding that the proceeding is not pending (and Section 18(b)) doesn’t apply until the PTO grants the petition. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
The answer is simple:] The existence of a likelihood of confusion must be assessed globally, taking into account all factors relevant to the case".The CJEU has now ruled as follows:Article 4(1)(b) ... [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Most filing instructions, no matter what the jurisdiction or publisher, are fairly straight forward. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 11:08 am
Over to Tom for his report on AIPPI's Trade Mark Tuesday: “Don’t miss the (right) mark” In the first session of the day, the panel addressed issues surrounding registrability and regulatory matters affecting the approval and enforcement of pharma trade marks in Brazil, the US, Canada and the Philippines. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:22 am
B-2 Visa If your relative doesn’t plan to stay in the U.S. permanently, they may get quicker entry with a B-2 visa. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
DON’T WAIT. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:47 pm
b. any U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:07 am
” and the child’s heart (no matter what age) breaks into thousands of tiny pieces never to be repaired. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:34 am
I don’t think U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Robert B. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
Does she talk as if she has experience with this type of matter? [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
Does she talk as if she has experience with this type of matter? [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:25 pm
Don't mess with Stalin. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:29 pm
Under the burden-shifting rubrick of California's anti-SLAPP statute, Gawker merely has to show that the lawsuit involves speech on a matter of public interest. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
For purposes of © preemption, we’ve argued that it doesn’t matter. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
That statute provides, in relevant part: ‘A person who assaults any person having lawful charge, control, or custodyof any mail matter or of any money or other property of the United States, with intent to rob, steal, or purloin such mail matter, money, or other property of the United States, [shall be guilty of a crime]. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
That won’t work for ROP b/c so much of the regulated stuff is art. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
B. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
Here is one that is not discussed: shifting the burden of proof on admissibility to the opponent of the expert witness’s opinion: “Testimony from an expert is presumed to be helpful unless it concerns matters within the everyday knowledge and experience of a lay juror. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
The motion in the Virender Singh case, however, didn’t focus on that. [read post]
