Search for: "People v Goode" Results 9081 - 9100 of 22,582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2008, 9:09 pm
Finally, perhaps most provocatively, if there's a contraction of some form in the legal-education market, might that be a good thing? [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:35 pm by Sophia Cope
” Thus the Supreme Court created the border search exception only for the narrow purposes of enforcing the immigration and customs laws, including ensuring that duties are paid on imported goods and that harmful people (e.g., terrorists) and harmful goods such as weapons, drugs, and infested agricultural products do not enter the country. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
Enough people fell into the latter camp for there to be infringement. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am by Michael Risch
Take what I say with a grain of salt - I think Rite Hite v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:06 am by SHG
  Not being a lawprof, I defer to the Dave's list, which strikes me as pretty good. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
” In Indiana, the people will vote on a similar referred amendment in the 2016 general election: “(a) The right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife: (1) is a valued part of Indiana’s heritage; and (2) shall be forever preserved for the public good. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Occasionally, there have been calls for businesses to simply not deal with certain people at the outset—consider Castaneda v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
"Nigger" is a part of the lexicon of American culture about which people, especially lawyers, need to be aware. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Ames, 188 U.S. 321 (1903) (Commerce power extended to prohibiting commerce in certain goods, in this case shipping Paraguayan lottery tickets across state lines);  Swift and Company v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]