Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 9081 - 9100 of 28,751
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
In these cases, too, the state belatedly disclosed the prosecution’s notes in the capital trials. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Davis, which held that lawyers' ineffective work on state habeas proceedings did not excuse a procedural default because there's no constitutional right to counsel in state habeas proceedings. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am by Joseph Fishkin
In Evenwel, the plaintiffs’ claim was that only voters, rather than all persons, should count for purposes of districting (at the state level). [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:42 am by Peter Mahler
None of the correspondence explicitly referred to the mediation as binding, as stated in Section 3.3.3. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  Since then, there has been another substantial award of A$2.623m in Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367 and a claim for A$4.8m made in Wagner v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd, with the trial currently being heard. [read post]
Courts in New York did not enforce non-compete agreements against employees that were involuntarily terminated as part of a plant closure (SIFCO Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
 He demonstrated the disparity in the qualification of trade secrets that fundamentally, at national level, most Member States do not consider trade secrets to be IP rights, except Italy, Spain, Latvia and Slovakia. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
The answer, at Federal District level in the United States at least, is "maybe".In May 2012, stock images company DRK Photo sued textbook publishing giant McGraw-Hill for alleged copyright infringement. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:03 am by Scott R. Anderson
Thus it presumably authorizes the same scope of activities, which the Supreme Court found to include law of war detention in Hamdi v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
(Privacy Shield is functionally an adequacy assurance, or an assurance that the U.S. provides an adequate level of protection for that data under Chapter V of the GDPR). [read post]