Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 9101 - 9120 of 13,836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Gina Durham
Reproduced with permission from Electronic Commerce & Law Report, (June 13, 2012). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:40 am by Maya Risman
  The pilots allege a long history of discriminatory behavior on behalf of United across multiple U.S. states. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by The Complex Litigator
 The California Supreme Court will need to resolve these issues soon, regardless of whether the United States Supreme Court takes on any of these issues in the future. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:44 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The decision purports to not expressly interpret Concepcion, stating, “[t]he conclusions we reach here avert any dependence . . . on two recent United States Supreme Court opinions, addressing the issue of class arbitrations for antitrust claims and consumer sales contracts. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:33 am by Alex Vitrak
Through well-established executive authority, the administration will temporarily spare youth educated in America’s schools from expulsion from the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
The Mag-Lite trademark was registered with the United States Patent Trademark Office in 1979. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
The Mag-Lite trademark was registered with the United States Patent Trademark Office in 1979. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
The Mag-Lite trademark was registered with the United States Patent Trademark Office in 1979. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:28 am by Rick Hasen
Establish a national initiative allowing voters to vote directly on legislation instead of going through Congress, making the United States more like California. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:40 pm by Curt Cutting
Can the factor of comparable civil or criminal penalties, the third guidepost of federal due process review established by the United States Supreme Court, be considered “essentially irrelevant” in all cases involving common-law tort duties, or in asbestos-related personal injury cases in particular? [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm
In this case courts will usually undertake an “economic realities” test, which considers five factors articulated in the Supreme Court’s 1947 decision in United States v. [read post]