Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 9101 - 9120
of 28,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2013, 4:10 pm
See Childs v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:06 am
Especially in light of her pro se status, those allegations were sufficient to state a claim." [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:03 am
United States, No. 11-5350 (D.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 7:20 am
This distinction is shown well by the Sixth Circuit's recent decision in Hughes v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:42 am
Pulse Health LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:42 pm
Devane v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
Including the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Fessler v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 3:00 am
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113 v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 11:12 am
Parents are advised to use their bestjudgment, keeping the child's maturity level and safety issues in mind. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:54 am
Circuit Judge William Traxler stated that, “On the most basic level, clicking on the ‘like’ button literally causes to be published the statement that the User ‘likes’ something, which is itself a substantive statement”. [read post]
27 May 2022, 6:06 am
Wisconsin is one of the leading states for intoxicated boating and boating accidents. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:14 am
We see how that all works out in a recent Second Circuit decision that upholds a New York City gun regulation against a Second Amendment challenge.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:51 am
Anyway:Lewis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 12:37 am
Unlike AG Szpunar, the Court did not refer liability only to situations in which the operators of an online platform have acquired actual knowledge of third-party infringements, but also included situations of constructive knowledge (‘could not be unaware’) and, possibly, even more.Overall, the CJEU decision is not limited to egregious scenarios like the one of The Pirate Bay: the Court’s findings are applicable to different types of online platforms, as well as… [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In Abiding Place Ministries v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
The ALJ concluded that Charleman’s acceptance and redemption of benefits for up to nine months after she was employed by HRA, “when she must have known that she was not entitled to them, suggests a high level of dishonesty that is incompatible with continuing to be employed to manage public assistance benefits. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
In McCafferty v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Puntenney v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 am
One of the CFTC's own experts, Arizona State University professor Hendrik Bessembinder, entered into a consulting agreement with Compass, but the court determined that this did not rise to the level of "side-switching" that would justify such an extreme sanction. [read post]
