Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 19,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2018, 8:12 pm
For example, in Richmond Coal Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
” Slip op. at 17 n.15 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
(citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:33 am
Miller v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:15 am
The “use or absence of punctuation marks, such as hyphens, does not alter the fact that a name is identical to a mark,” Chernow Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
In its appeal, the government cites to another Supreme Court decision regarding the band name “The Slants,” (Matal v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
In its appeal, the government cites to another Supreme Court decision regarding the band name “The Slants,” (Matal v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Granted, it's only recognized in Louisiana, but there's no case out there stating flat out that Pennsylvania (or probably most other states) refuse to recognize it. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:56 pm
In People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
The case is TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:38 am
Cir. 2008) (internalquotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:52 am
” People v Cox, 286 N.Y. 137, 142 (1941). [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Supreme Court’s decision this week in Matal v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:59 am
Rule 62(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Rules 2008 states:"62. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(Spicy IP) Defining ‘literary works’ for copyright protection (International Law Office) Drafting and interpretation of patent claims (IP Frontline) Israel Israel Patent Office accepts lacks jurisdiction and rules anyway: Karl Storz GmbH & Co v Bausch and Lomb (The IP Factor) Economist report ranks Israel 10th in terms of innovation (The IP Factor) Mauritius Mauritius launches IP sensitivity drive (Afro-IP) Netherlands Presiding… [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
” Gertz v. [read post]
