Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 43,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2009, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:02 am
Found. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 9:21 pm
This was the right decision, and we urge the Supreme Court to uphold it.For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/nieves-v-bartlett-amicus-briefFor more on EFF’s work supporting the First Amendment right to record the… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 11:41 am
In Weingarten v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 6:24 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in Stephens Media LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
The court cited to American Express Centurion Bank v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's ruling states:"The article 78 court correctly determined, upon consideration of all the facts, that respondents' denial of petitioner's application for reinstatement to his former position with NYCHA was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669, 671 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:01 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
The case, of course, is Miranda v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
MGFB Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
The consolidated cases are Gill v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:33 am
Stern v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 11:43 pm
Military Commissions:United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:51 am
From Sida v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Further, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' requests for sanctions against, and disqualification of, the Attorney General were properly denied, explaining the record shows that "the Attorney General made reasonable arguments which did not in any manner justify the imposition of sanctions" (See 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]; Matter of Doe v Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., 172 AD3d 1691; Matter of Cobado v Benziger, 163 AD3d 1103). [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Further, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' requests for sanctions against, and disqualification of, the Attorney General were properly denied, explaining the record shows that "the Attorney General made reasonable arguments which did not in any manner justify the imposition of sanctions" (See 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]; Matter of Doe v Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., 172 AD3d 1691; Matter of Cobado v Benziger, 163 AD3d 1103). [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:29 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 10:58 am
–State v. [read post]
