Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 9121 - 9140 of 11,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
This should be the end of the story and this was supported in Genetech Inc’s Patent [1989] RPC 147. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Mesa: In this case, the justices will decide what standard courts should use to determine whether the Fourth Amendment applies outside the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Even registering a trademarked term as a domain name, and using it to put up a site criticizing the mark owner, has been held to be protected First Amendment activity in a number of cases (see, e.g., Lucas Nursery & Landscaping, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
"Bongiovanni stated he spoke with Nella on several occasions after her husband died and suggested to her that she execute a new will. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:53 am by Schachtman
The trial court denied the petition,3 and in a non-precedential opinion [sic], the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of coram nobis.4 United States v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
United States The EARN IT Act has returned to the Senate and House, which has prompted a response from Riana Pfefferkorn reminding Congress of the problems the proposed legislation causes for encryption, privacy and online speech, without guaranteeing improvement to children’s safety online. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]