Search for: "Ex Parte Mays"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 12,876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
(Maybe so, but . . . ) I hate my ex! [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:45 pm
May 21, 2009). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
It is as much a part of the Amendment as any of the other sections, and how it became a part of the Amendment is less important than what it says and what it means.Pressed upon us by the respondents, and by amici curiae, are contentions that these notions are outmoded, and that the more modern view is that it is essential to the process of rehabilitating the ex-felon that he be returned to his role in society as a fully participating citizen when he has completed the… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
The father's further contention that a local ordinance limiting the locations where registered sex offenders may be employed has prevented him from finding employment was not raised in his written objections to the Support Magistrate's order and thus was not preserved for review. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
The father's further contention that a local ordinance limiting the locations where registered sex offenders may be employed has prevented him from finding employment was not raised in his written objections to the Support Magistrate's order and thus was not preserved for review. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:56 am
Disposition Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order is thereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The use of the Stars and Stripes has featured in First Amendment cases in the past and it played a part in Dariano v Morgan Hill Unified School District (8 November 2011). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:41 pm
She was ultimately found by the most senior family judge to be a fabricator who had coached her daughter to lie about being abused by her ex-partner. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:30 pm
They may indeed be on occasion part of the problem. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:47 pm
Alternative workweek schedules can be proposed for an entire work unit or as a part of a menu of options for a work unit. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:09 pm
At all times, ex parte com- munication with the arbitrators was prohibited. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Why oh why can't the mega-talented Mitt be more like his dad, George, the late crowd-pleasing ex-governor of Michigan? [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
In other words, these are ex parte seizures of web sites that may contain, especially in the context of music or film blogs where people share opinions about media and offer their own remixes, significant amounts of First Amendment protected expression. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:22 am
MF Global is also facing legal challenges from ex-employees laid off last week. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:55 pm
Sure a company can create a new Twitter profile and require the ex-employee to relinquish the account's name due, in part, to trade mark considerations but what happens if the ex-employee does that and keeps communicating with all those followers? [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:26 pm
You may feel angry towards your ex but you can’t be like that for the rest of your life. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:44 pm
This motion involves the defense’s request that Military Judge Pohl allow in camera, ex parte requests to the Convening Authority for expert assistance while only providing minimal notice to the prosecution. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:33 am
Here’s a word of caution for lawyers who use Twitter professionally: If you part ways with your firm, your ex-employer may get custody of your Tweets. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
Given the length of this part of the hearing, I’ll be presenting it in three parts, one for each of the three defense motions ruled on by Military Judge Pohl. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
This is a problem caused by a number of factors, but a significant factor is a worry on the part of the judgment-giver that he may be criticised on appeal for not dealing, often in some detail, with every point that has been raised.While a party should know why the Judge reached the conclusions he or she did as a fundamental principle, there was no need for the judgment to do into more detail that this principle required. [read post]
