Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 44,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co., 91 NY2d at 653; Soto v State Farm Ins. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:07 pm
See, e.g., Eagle v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:46 am
Neither is it too surprising or noteworthy when an antitrust lawyer, including very good ones like Barnett, say things when representing a client that are at tension with prior statements made when representing other clients. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 8:23 am
” Saxon argues that the exemption applies to employees that directly contribute to the transportation of goods across state lines. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:51 am
Also note that if the Garcia v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:58 am
Tribes usually try to avoid state regulation by asserting their immunity from state authority, and the Supreme Court decided a case affirming tribal immunity this year captioned Michigan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm
Judgment is awaited from the UK Supreme Court as to whether software supplied electronically as a download and not on any tangible medium is goods for the purposes of the Commercial Agents Regulations (Computer Associates (UK) Ltd v The Software Incubator Ltd). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:33 pm
McLafferty v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
To state it succinctly, the court found that good notice had been given. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Court State of Texas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
In Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:03 pm
Good question Erica. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
Manley has 35 years of experience at good faith deposits. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 9:56 pm
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs announced an executive order on Friday that protects abortion rights within the state one year after the Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 9:37 am
Vo v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
A mark must allow consumers to identify the commercial origin of goods and services, which consequently enables future buying decisions, following Sykes v OHIM, Case T‑130/01. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
In November 2019, the Board dismissed the appeal and found that there was a likelihood of confusion by considering, first, the average degree of visual and phonetic similarity of the marks at issue and, second, the identity of the goods in question.The Applicant subsequently appealed to the General Court.The General Court’s considerationsRelevant public and its level of attentionThe General Court confirmed the Board’s finding that the relevant public was the French public,… [read post]
