Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 9121 - 9140 of 10,423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2010, 9:00 am by Breyer Law Offices
For example, a store may be under maintenance, but if there is no sign to warn a shopper, the person can slip or fall and suffer broken bones, concussions, harm to the spinal cord, or internal bruising. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:03 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Why can’t bartenders require people to identify and/or mark the driver in their party? [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:03 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Why can’t bartenders require people to identify and/or mark the driver in their party? [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:54 pm by Gerard Magliocca
 And tarnishment refers to a mark owner’s power to enjoin the use of a similar mark that creates unwholesome associations harmful to the brand. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm by Breyer Law Offices
Mark and Alexis Breyer, Husband and Wife pair at Breyer Law Offices, P.C., know how painful a motorcycle injury or brain accident can be for a person and their loved one. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm by David Walk
If you ask a man on the street about this they would say: Yes, I want to know whether this drug is harmful to me. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:51 am by Jonathan Bailey
Removing a watermark shows a great deal of bad faith and can greatly harm the potential market for a work. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 9:17 am by Paul Ohm
Threats offline are marked by their potential to cause harm. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:54 am by Jon L. Gelman
” Crawford, 194 F.3d at 959 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 11:33 am by Jonathan Bailey
The Ars Technica “experiment” marking the first time in recent history a major, well-respected site went against ad blockers head on, even calling them freeloaders. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:55 am by Eugene Volokh
If it were possible by laying down a principled standard to separate [outrageous speech] from [protected speech], public discourse would probably suffer little or no harm. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 8:50 am by Donn Zaretsky
Mark Durney had an interesting post on the subject over the weekend, with links to David Gill ("forgeries have corrupted collections for centuries") and Bruno Frey ("the harmful effects of fakes are small and mitigated by emerging institutions (guarantees, sellers with reputation)"). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:10 am
February 28th marked the effective date for the SEC's expanded executive compensation and corporate governance disclosure rules which we have previously reported on (see our December 18, 2009 blog). [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:18 am by Gary L. Francione
A fundamental assumption of the new welfarist position is that killing animals does not per se inflict a harm on them. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
The only conditions set forth by the agency are that the proposed turbines must be marked and lit in accordance with FAA requirements, including white paint and synchronized red lights. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Our bill is a responsible, achievable approach which prevents the EPA from enacting regulations that would harm coal and gives Congress time to establish a balanced program. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
These contests are especially harmful for independent inventors. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:01 am
The parade of clowns including (but certainly not limited to) Mark Sanford and John Ensign is not generally engaging in things that most Americans consider to be serious moral infractions. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:37 pm by Dwight Sullivan
On 27 January 2010, the House Judiciary Committee marked up the Equal Justice For Our Military Act of 2009. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]