Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 9121 - 9140 of 22,033
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2017, 11:00 am by Allison Takacs
The purpose of subsection (i)(10) is to "avoid the possibility of shareholders having to consider matters which have already been favorably acted upon by management. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:00 am by Sophie Fritz
The purpose of subsection (i)(10) is to "avoid the possibility of shareholders having to consider matters which have already been favorably acted upon by management. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:42 am by Renae Bomba, Esq.
The commission voted 4-0 to continue the matter to its next meeting on September 25, 2017. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Self-represented litigants may submithandwritten applications provided that the handwriting is legible andotherwise in conformity with these rules. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Self-represented litigants may submithandwritten applications provided that the handwriting is legible andotherwise in conformity with these rules. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Castle, 2017 NY Slip Op 05960, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentOn June 27, 2012 the Town Board of the Town of North Castle adopted a resolution establishing a "Compensation and Benefits Manual" [Manual]. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:07 pm by dphillips
While horses are sent to a facility for “adoption,” that frequently leads to their sale for slaughter in Mexico and Canada. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 11:09 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 It means that most green card applicants cannot leave the U.S. on short notice no matter if grandma is dying or a business emergency requires immediate foreign travel. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by Lev Martyniuk
The court determined as a matter of fact that “[i]n this case, the corporate LLC agreement substantially re-creates the governance structure of a Delaware corporation using language drawn from the corporate domain. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by Lev Martyniuk
The court determined as a matter of fact that “[i]n this case, the corporate LLC agreement substantially re-creates the governance structure of a Delaware corporation using language drawn from the corporate domain. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The relevance of big data and artificial intelligence transcends process improvements in law alone, and will increasingly become the a significant subject matter within law. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 2:13 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
When faced with a statutory claim that has foreign elements, courts seek to determine the territorial scope of the statute as a matter of Parliamentary intent, even if it is clear that Parliament did not give any thought to the matter. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 2:22 pm by Barry Sookman
The interpretation we adopt here is not in conflict with the meaning of paragraph 3(1)(f) of the Act as described in that decision. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm by Eduardo Ustaran
Since day one, the ICO has adopted a broad interpretation of what amounts to direct marketing. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Robert Chesney
  Whether that actually is the case with respect to Afghanistan, of course, is a different matter. 4. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
Ralph, supra.The opinion then explains that[h]earsay is any out-of-court statement that is used to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is generally inadmissible unless it is a recognized exception to the hearsay rule. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, the HIPAA regulations also calculate the 30-percent incentive level based on the total cost of coverage, which includes the cost of family coverage, rather than the cost of self-only coverage that the ADA rule adopts. . . . current insurance rates. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Deukmejian, a 1990 ruling and the most instance in which the court held a measure to be a revision. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 5:22 pm by Paresh Trivedi
Paresh Trivedi In a landmark decision, a nine judge bench of the Supreme Court of India ruled today that privacy is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution of India. [read post]