Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 12,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 8:40 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
The cert petition in Maples v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:18 am
The best chance of doing that is making sure the lawsuit is in a State Court rather than a Federal Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
If a case has been relisted once, it generally means that the Court is paying close attention to the case, and the chances of a grant are higher than for an average case. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The opinion does not state whether the mother received Demerol before birth. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:32 pm
The case will give the Court a chance to clarify when a failure to satisfy a state procedural rule bars an arguably blameless state inmate from taking his case on to the federal courts. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm
"The reason, the court said in the case of Amnesty International USA v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:57 pm
You see UCLA is a public college, meaning that it not only receives a large chunk of its funding from the state of California, but under National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:36 pm
But rules are rules.It's a continuing debate: Fairness v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 3:15 pm
I think there's a good chance that the Court will decide to grant Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:41 am
The odds are not good for a judicial challenge to it, and since the decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am
O' Hair Professor of Evidence & Procedure, Michigan State University School of Law. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Parallel Networks v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
(See Stayart v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Ndubizu v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:07 am
" State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
SG and 35 state AGs have weighed in claiming that data mining does not merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
