Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 27,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2017, 4:58 am
Second, it is interesting on a visceral level, as we witness a taxpayer, to use a cliché, being hoisted on their own petard.United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 10:49 am
This certainly applies to FLSA (Federal Labor Standards Act) and many California Labor Code provisions. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 7:40 am
Bifurcated AvocadoState v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:44 pm
Yang Seyfarth Synopsis: Last month in Mendoza v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:33 pm
Ken has been writing code since 1973. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:21 pm
They held banners stating that homosexuality was natural and normal and not a perversion. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm
Code § 1983. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm
In a case from last year, West Philadelphia Achievement Charter Elementary School v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Owens v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:55 am
In an unpublished decision entitled Avalon Princeton, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
š v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:49 am
Merchant (Witnesses) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn Interest of L.M.B. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:33 pm
Merchant (Witnesses)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn Interest of L.M.B. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:51 am
A collective bargaining agreement may expand an employer's obligation to provide information to an employee organization not specifically provided for by lawCity of New York v New York State Nurses Assn., 2017 NY Slip Op 04492, Court of AppealsNew York State Nurses Association (Union) filed an improper practice petition with the Board of Collective Bargaining of the City of New York (the Board), alleging that it had a right to certain information pursuant to New York… [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:24 am
Additional Resources: Cooley v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
In Monday’s decision in the newly minted, Matal v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
This concession was not something which was reflected in the Government’s statement at the time of laying the new rules before Parliament to effect that the rules were a complete code without any residual discretion. [read post]
