Search for: "York v York"
Results 9121 - 9140
of 51,499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm
A website operated from Topeka, Kansas is subject not only to the ADA and the laws of Kansas, but also to the laws of New York, New York City, California, and a host of other varying state and municipal standards. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
United States The New York Times had a piece “American Could Face Prison in Thailand After Posting Negative Reviews of a Resort”. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
District Court of the Southern District of New York. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
Brentwood Industries v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm
Bush v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:24 pm
Bush v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
” Yamashita v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 10:31 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
These cases include Reed v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 8:18 am
Lawrence Friedman's A History of American Law (4th ed. 2019 available online) notes the growth in diploma privilege practices: "Between 1855 and 1870, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, New York, Tennessee, Michigan, and Wisconsin gave the privilege to graduates of home-state law schools. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 8:13 am
” “In Patzner v Burkett, 779 F. 2d 1363 (8th Cir. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 4:02 pm
Colby Itkowitz of The Washington Post reports that “Barrett signed ad in 2006 decrying ‘barbaric legacy’ of Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 8:30 am
I am pleased to announce the 2020-21 lineup for the University of Pennsylvania Legal History Workshop: October 1, 2020: Melissa Murray (New York University School of Law)“Race-ing Roe: Reproductive Justice, Racial Justice, and the Battle for Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:48 am
On December 26, 2018, respondent presided over Paul Jones v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 4:07 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm
As discussed in greater detail below, the ESSTA Amendments: (i) revise the amount of leave that New York City employers are required to provide; (ii) impose new employer reporting requirements; (iii) create new employer reimbursement obligations in connection with requested medical documentation and/or documentation regarding domestic violence; (iv) expand the scope of prohibited retaliation under the law; (v) impose new notice requirements; and (vi) expand enforcement… [read post]
