Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 9141 - 9160 of 12,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
I think the answer is ‘yes’ to both questions,” said Schwartz, former acting general counsel for the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:09 pm by Bexis
  We also felt that way while we were involved in the Fagan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am by David Dirr
  For this reason, California does not argue that private parties should never be able to bring preemption claims under the Supremacy Clause. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by GuestPost
 He has previously blogged for HR in I on his work with the Texas Defender Service, which represents people on death row. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:45 pm by Eric
Prior blog coverage of Righthaven: * Resetting the Righthaven Fiasco * Righthaven Defendant Awarded $3,800 in Attorneys' Fees--Righthaven v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by KC Johnson
” (This is about the only time at any point in the case that I have encountered an implication of ex-Sgt. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
However today, for once, I feel that I am on the side of the lions and that it is Farisha who is being thrown to them". [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:18 am by Orin Kerr
I wanted to flag another question: Does ordering a suspect to empty his pockets during a stop-and-frisk violate the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
 In prior articles, I noted the existence of the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2011 (H.R. 1873), which would exempt consumer, civil rights, and employment disputes from the FAA as well as reverse Rent-A-Center West, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
The factual and legal basis of this discussion comes from the Louisiana Supreme Court case McGlothlin v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Donna Eng
While all of the above cases present interesting questions, I think the opinion I am most wanting to read is that which will come in UNITED STATES V. [read post]