Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9141 - 9160
of 16,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
In that capacity I have come to know and deeply appreciate distinguished (and always humble) legal historians such as Jeffrey Morris, John Wunder and Mark Scherer. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Mark I. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Seems like the Catholic Church wants to impose its own views on these matters of religious theology on all of the people its employees. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
Prosecutorial discretion is better viewed as an exercise of the lawyer’s judgment about a particular matter. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
But Elkins didn’t talk to prosecutors previously about audio feed matters to third parties, despite his knowledge of where audio feeds from the courtroom traveled. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
X, The Hague District Court, The Netherlands (EPLAW) Poland Polish court rules on trade mark use (Class 46) Polish case law on industrial designs (Polish IT & IP Law News) Switzerland Cheshire Cat: a geographic indication? [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
" The Court didn't reach that question, however, because of its resolution of the other questions presented. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:57 am
However, the challenges of GDPR certainly don’t end on the date this law goes into implementation. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Fairness in Numbers: A Comment on AT&T v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
In addition, Justices Roberts, Breyer, and Sotomayor concluded in Brunetti that the government could ban registration of matter that is scandalous without violating the First Amendment as long as the trademark law targeted marks that are obscene, vulgar, or profane. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
He has never ever wanted money out of the case, all he has ever wanted was to prove he didn’t sell stories. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 6:11 am
Here's my bottom line: I don't accept that free-born Canadian citizens need the permission of the Canadian state to read my columns. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:12 am
Can't they see that it doesn't matter how much it will cost them, so long as they remember that the Unified Patent Court is the most politically expedient compromise that money can buy? [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am
S. 183, 187 (2006) (per curiam) (remanding to agency based on failure by Court of Appeals to "appl[y] the ordinary remand rule" (internal quotation marks omitted)); INS v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
LG Chem” (with the quote marks) into Google and you get over 5,000 hits—pretty good for a patent law case. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
This is a matter often overlooked by those seeking to theorize the rise of China. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:44 pm
This is a matter often overlooked by those seeking to theorize the rise of China. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
” 545 U.S. at 936 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
In response to Brian's question as to whether Mark was optimistic that we are nearing a solution on second medical use, Mark stated that he was. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
It needn't have, the CAFC panel majority ruled. [read post]
